The seller left you bad feedback as he offered you a full refund on a card you were not happy with, and you declined. You left negative feedback for the seller, and the seller left you negative feedback as you declined the full refund yet still wanted to complain about it.
I think the seller is quite justified in leaving you a negative in this instance, as his experience with you was a negative one, so why can't he let others know of this experience with you ? I am the first person to remove retaliatory feedbacks, however I do not believe that is the case in this instance, so the feedback will stand. As you once said to me "what's the point in having a negative feedback option if you can't use it?"
Condition of a card is subjective - whats mint to you, may not be mint to the next person, may not be mint to another. If you are concerned about the condition and cannot tell from the photos/scans of a card, it is up to you as the buyer to request additional scans of a card.
Giving cards grades out of 10 is a very subjective thing and honestly 70% of members probably couldn't do it accurately.
I'll keep it simple as you asked.
I don't like the idea.
In the eyes of a professional grader yes. But I have spent too many years in the hobby with condition sensitive cards to say nothing is certain when it comes to grading.
MINT is the most over used and abused word in the hobby.
And that being my point.... Everybody just states the card is mint, and they are not even checking their cards!!!
I am a little confused !!!
So its not up to the seller to disclose any serious flaws in the cards they are selling ???
If you are offering a card or cards for sale then it is up to "YOU" to make sure that it is in good condition !!! I am sure plenty of us check over our cards that we have purchased, why should it be any different when you are selling them....
If a seller decides to risk it then they also risk getting negative feedback.......... experienced collectors have no excuse selling Shiit conditioned cards especially if they don't have the decency to disclose the "true" condition
As for accepting a refund (where i am guessing the buyer has to pay post too) Just like Ryse getting his logoman sent in bad condition, he wanted to desperately add that card to his collection so why should accepting a refund be the only option. The seller will more than likely try to sell it again and possibly rip off another buyer (not directed at anyone !)
How does "not accepting" a refund constitute a Negative feedback.... sounds like a retalitory negative to me
I have a Current situation where a card i purchased (that i want to keep) had a few small creases around the patch area and a dinged corner. I didn't see flaws in the pic and i would expect if its being offered for sale with zero flaws stated in the description then that is exacty what i should receive.... I didn't send him anything different than what I was charged
I asked about getting something in compensation but no reply even after pointing out my wantlists
Does this mean that If i don't accept a refund (which i would not want) i then run the risk of getting a negative feedback if I gave a negative for items not sold as described or Items sold damaged...
If its possible can Someone please clear this up for me !
My comments are not related to this particular case but in general
But do you agree that a card that is MINT is a 10/10 card with NO issues??
The seller left you bad feedback as he offered you a full refund on a card you were not happy with, and you declined. You left negative feedback for the seller, and the seller left you negative feedback as you declined the full refund yet still wanted to complain about it.
I think the seller is quite justified in leaving you a negative in this instance, as his experience with you was a negative one, so why can't he let others know of this experience with you ? I am the first person to remove retaliatory feedbacks, however I do not believe that is the case in this instance, so the feedback will stand. As you once said to me "what's the point in having a negative feedback option if you can't use it?"
Don't think that just because you a buyer you can be a protected species like on eBay. This isn't eBay. Never has been, never will be.
Condition of a card is subjective. The word mint is an often misused statement - whats mint to you, may not be mint to the next person, may not be mint to another, and will probably not be mint to me. If you are concerned about the condition and cannot tell from the photos/scans of a card, it is up to you as the buyer to request additional scans of a card.
But do you agree that a card that is MINT is a 10/10 card with NO issues??
This isn't eBay. Never has been, never will be.Amen to that! I guess thats what makes this such a great community
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?