ozballer23
#1 J.R. Smith Collector
the story starts at 4th paragraph.
here it is quote form that link I posted:
thanks for the info

the story starts at 4th paragraph.
here it is quote form that link I posted:
thanks for the info![]()
like don't get me wrong I still probably will buy one, one day, but knowing the above fact kind of makes me a bit sad about that card.
but when will the 84 star be regarded as his true rookie
,i have recently purchased one of those cards, i dont know which one it is but its very nice
i will post a pic![]()
Is there no way of telling the difference between an original 84 card and a 90's reprint ? I guess not if the original plates were reused.
wouldn't the age of the ink be a give away? surely one would be much brighter than the other?
well depends hwo the card was stored.
I could leave this years card out in the sun and it will fade.
if stored away in a dark place in the bag, they would be almost identical colour.
I guess i have one-----
![]()
---------- Post added 09-09-2009 at 05:54 AM ----------
ou another one?
in my list:
![]()
Thanks for updating the thread Nick! Looks like we got some sweet mj's on the site!
No. 3 on Becketts list actually looks like this:
![]()
Nevertheless, personally i would prefer the 1997 SPX Promotion AU /100 (the one currently pictured at No. 3) all day. Looks nicer, has the COA directly on the card and is tougher to forge.
No. 1 on Becketts list would not make it into my personal Top 23. Historically it may be, but from a collectors point of view as of today... no way. Too many counterfeits, not MJs true RC year, tens of thousands of cards produced and thus available at any time, even in NR-MT condition.
So, No. 2 belongs to No. 1 and where is the 97-98 PMG Green /10 ?
Nice list, anyway as the author obviously provided a thoughtful list.