I seriously think this rule is flawed.
Think, I can buy from 10 different members here, and once I accumulate 10 feedbacks, I can command members with less than 10 feedbacks to send me their cards first without paying!
I am talking about selling a card or cards here, not trading. Everyone knows, when you buy something on the net, you pay first then you wait for delivery. Why is the process reversed here? The seller has no protection at all! Whereas the buyer is already protected by Paypal, why does the buyer need additional protection?
Shouldn't the regulation be just a guide? And leave to members discretion in its execution? I mean, will the site compensate the seller should the buyer eventually not pay? If not, then I think I should be practicing my own discretion then.
Think, I can buy from 10 different members here, and once I accumulate 10 feedbacks, I can command members with less than 10 feedbacks to send me their cards first without paying!
I am talking about selling a card or cards here, not trading. Everyone knows, when you buy something on the net, you pay first then you wait for delivery. Why is the process reversed here? The seller has no protection at all! Whereas the buyer is already protected by Paypal, why does the buyer need additional protection?
Shouldn't the regulation be just a guide? And leave to members discretion in its execution? I mean, will the site compensate the seller should the buyer eventually not pay? If not, then I think I should be practicing my own discretion then.