most of his panini stuff seems to be the full name, the older stuff seems to be the Kobe versionKobe is also another.. Sometimes it's just "Kobe" other times it's both first name and surname.
Bogut is a good example of our his sig has changed.
do I value more - not really, certainly the full sigs do hold more value
most of his panini stuff seems to be the full name, the older stuff seems to be the Kobe version
Uuhhh, that was going to be my next question. Does it hold more value?
I thought it might do, as I have only seen it occur in a player i used to collect. He only ever signed his name on 1 card series
i've not really seen it with cards, mainly the difference with in person autos. The difference in card signatures are usually time based, when they change their signatures, so i don't see a price difference as most of the sigs are all the same for that time period.
Yup, I really like Rondae Hollis-Jefferson's early rookie year autos, but later on he shortened it
I'll show you want i mean, the player I had in mind when i was writing this was Steve Nash.
However, I was just browseing e-bay and got distracted by seeing another player sign differently to what he normaly does and it had me intrigued and even somewaht, interested to buy a card (as I don't own a card of his in my collection).
Had Nash in mind when reading your post...... would certainly pay more for a full signature.......a lot of Rookies start out signing well then once they have signed their first 10,000 cards they tend to shorten their signature or get one of their posse to sign for them instead.
Some of the Rookie Photo shoot signature cards are some of the best autos they sign.
As they go on in their career, they think of signing as more of a chore and really dont care too much about what/how they are signing.
Cheers
Matt
lol, great minds think alike.
Yeah, my immediate reaction was "to pay more" as well. But then again, i've been out ofthe hobby for so long and doing all this e-bay browseing etc got me thinking the difference between the RC or earlier auto's compared to auto's later on in there careers.
I completely forgot about the signing 10000 cards aspect as well.
Uhhh, the good old photoshoot. I remember those cards were really hot back in the day. Not even sure if they do them anymore?
Most of the rookie stuff is signed at the photoshoot.... some on card, lots of stickers........then the later released get sent to the rookies to sign and send back to Panini.
Example....
Now.....
Yes, I would definitely pay moreThats exactly what i mean, RC auto's appear that the players had more time (or more care) to auto more clearly etc
So a question for you, you obvioulsy like his earlier autos more. Do you pay more for them? (just forgetting that RC stuff is worth more so to speak), like would you pay more for an auto that is more fuller and nicer?
The question I now have though -
Are you paying more because it is a full auto or because it is a rookie/rare auto?
eg. Kobe seems to have only signed the Kobe8 signature on upper deck items
According to beckett he has 832 Upper Deck autos and 1652 Panini autos - without taking into account print runs - obviously the Upper Deck ones are worth more as more rare.
Even LeBron James also changed his signature in his rookie year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?