Fake????

If you look at the numbering it looks like 1000 until you see the mark above the 2nd 0 (1500).

It is 1500.
 
Matt26 said:
If you look at the numbering it looks like 1000 until you see the mark above the 2nd 0 (1500).

It is 1500.
Click to expand...

I wondered the same with the second zero but there is a connected zero definitely there. Just got home and looking at mine the 5 written on the card is pretty distinctive. Im still thinking its suss.

I have sent the seller a message. Will see if i get a response.
 
Here are my 3. See what im saying about the 5. Its pretty distinctive. Would be a stretch to think the writter messed it up.

img780.jpg
 
The first one took ages (3 mths+) to show up in the mail so i had a winge to Dynamic and they sent me another one in the meantime with the same number. The second one (which was the original) eventually showed up. I have COA letter for both - dodgy hey!!
 
And keeps thickening - sellers response. His memory is not great!

"I didn't have much info on this card and as I can't find it anywhere. From memory this card came straight out of the packet. Now that I look at the card again it does look like it says 1500 although it is not really clear. You should be able to enlarge the photo and see what I mean. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Have you seen one of these cards anywhere else?"

---------- Post added 19-01-2012 at 09:59 PM ----------
Cobretti said:
lol the second 905 (last on right) looks like it was the one signed later no?
Click to expand...

To tell you the truth i cant remember which was which. The COA letters were dated 25/8/1994 & 12/10/1994. From memory they ended up showing up about a week apart in the mail.
 
The ebay one looks fine to me, but of course it is out of 1500 not 1000.

On the other hand the one in Owen's far right looks super dodgy. The number is in a different hand and in the wrong place.

Regards, Jim
 
Are you trying to be funny Jim? As noted in previous posts i have the COA letter from Dynamic for all three cards and I redeemed the one your calling "super dodgy" personally.
 
Mine is signed in red. Dynamic had for some reason them signed in blue, black & red. I have a Mal one too with COA & the number is in red but signed in black but I've also seen Mals signed on red. I think dynamic where just hopeless & had no consistency with there sig cards
 
I have had some more conversations with the seller about this card. He is adamant that he pulled it personally from a packet. He has not COA or redemption card.

I personally am calling fake on this card. Apart from the fact these did not come direct out of packets the person who wrote the numbering on all Dyanamic signature card has/had quite distinctive writing. It does not match this card. If your thinking of buying steer clear.
 
Yeah looking at it on eBay now it does look like it was 1000 but then changed to look like 1500. The signature looks genuine but yeah Im agreeing with Owen that it's a fake
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
NRL Card talk, anything I might not know etc.
Replies
19
Views
1,298
saintsforever
saintsforever
OutlawNinja
What's some good games to play?!
Replies
0
Views
157
OutlawNinja
OutlawNinja
skip20
Slab happy!
Replies
15
Views
1,313
skip20
skip20
skip20
12 slam dunk titles and not much else mailday - Part 2
Replies
6
Views
706
skip20
skip20
MattWasGF4L
My Top 100 players all time - pic heavy
3 4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
5,680
MattWasGF4L
MattWasGF4L
Back
Top Bottom