If Stay what do you think they should be able to rule on?
Me personally I haven't seen any new benefits compared to the video ref style that was used before, to me the bunker now take twice as long to make a decision and still get wrong. For me it should be used for the match review committee for players that are charged in determining grade of punishment, aslo part of me still wants them to be able to determine try or not but nothing else. The on-field refs need to take back more control as they have become to reliant on the bunker and not do their job. i also don't get how the bunker can rule onoffside and not a forward pass to me they either don't rule on both (more preferred as thats the touch judges responsibility) or be able to make decison on both, doesnt make sense why ones ok and the other isn't
Me personally I haven't seen any new benefits compared to the video ref style that was used before, to me the bunker now take twice as long to make a decision and still get wrong. For me it should be used for the match review committee for players that are charged in determining grade of punishment, aslo part of me still wants them to be able to determine try or not but nothing else. The on-field refs need to take back more control as they have become to reliant on the bunker and not do their job. i also don't get how the bunker can rule onoffside and not a forward pass to me they either don't rule on both (more preferred as thats the touch judges responsibility) or be able to make decison on both, doesnt make sense why ones ok and the other isn't
Last edited: