theflyinggerco
OzCardTrader
No, but they would be down 2-1 at least, much better than 3-zip... Game 2, they were definately outplayed, Game 1, Spurs got away with some things, but they probably played better, and Cavs didn't deserve to win, but Game 3, Cavs were robbed...
The Cavs were robbed of having a chance at LeBron hitting 3 shots; he is not a great FT shooter, so thats not a given, especially with the pressure.
If he hit the all shots, Cleveland wouldnt have won; OT would have started. Granted the Cavs probably would been on a roll, but if Anderson Varejao wasnt a spastic and threw the ball back to LeBron, you could have won it in regulation.
My belief is that the Spurs are more patient and willing to wait than the Cavs; that comes with experience, even the younger players on the Spurs team, such as Parker and Ginobili have already been in 2 NBA Finals, and in Ginobili case, played numerous times in important games for Argentina and in European league. Oberto is a 10 years plus professional in Europe as well as a international vet.