The first eviction notice Fantasy League Draft
- Thread starter Dream34
- Start date
1. the power or right vested in one branch of a government to cancel or postpone the decisions, enactments, etc., of another branch, esp. the right of a president, governor, or other chief executive to reject bills passed by the legislature.
LOL like i said ill be furious if this stays vetoed for no reason at all!
When Gary payton gets traded for a young stud in Channing Frye!!! And if im not mistaken that higher person who vetoed my trade is involved in that deal.
Please fix this dream becuase im not happy i dont see any reason for this being vetoed.
When Gary payton gets traded for a young stud in Channing Frye!!! And if im not mistaken that higher person who vetoed my trade is involved in that deal.
Please fix this dream becuase im not happy i dont see any reason for this being vetoed.
Hold up a minute guys. Dream is the Commisioner so give him a little respect first 
There's an explanation for this, The Frye trade was proposed a while ago, I am more than happy to offload Frye (a benched player of mine) for a much needed PG and alot higher ranked Payton. This move will help me alot more than what keeping Frye would have, even if Frye goes batter this year than last. Dream made sure I was o.k. with this as the Commisioner does before he allowed it (even when it involved him). Payton will be playing a major rotational role at the Point for Miami this season aswell, just like last season.
Onto our trade, The Commisioner PM'd me to double check our trade and provided the info along with it. Info I wasn't aware of. That's why our trade was rejected (from my request). That's the Commisioner's job, every trade goes through him first.
Give him some credit for being a good Commisioner.
So why are you so upset with the trade not going through?
There's an explanation for this, The Frye trade was proposed a while ago, I am more than happy to offload Frye (a benched player of mine) for a much needed PG and alot higher ranked Payton. This move will help me alot more than what keeping Frye would have, even if Frye goes batter this year than last. Dream made sure I was o.k. with this as the Commisioner does before he allowed it (even when it involved him). Payton will be playing a major rotational role at the Point for Miami this season aswell, just like last season.
Onto our trade, The Commisioner PM'd me to double check our trade and provided the info along with it. Info I wasn't aware of. That's why our trade was rejected (from my request). That's the Commisioner's job, every trade goes through him first.
Give him some credit for being a good Commisioner.
So why are you so upset with the trade not going through?
You're obviously pissed and didn't read my post. The explanation is there.
The Commisioner has to o.k. every trade to keep the league as 'fair' as possible. What he does is evaluates the trade himself and if something doesn't look right to him, which he thought it didn't, he checks to make sure. He checked with me and I asked why? He provided me with some info that I wasn't aware of, which, if I had of known, I wouldn't have agreed to the trade. Simple as that.
It's a Fantasy League for some fun, build a bridge and move on. The fact that a trade involving the Commisioner was passed has no relevance. The fact is, no one else in our league has agreed to a trade at all yet for anything else to have even been considered by the Commisioner.
The Commisioner has to o.k. every trade to keep the league as 'fair' as possible. What he does is evaluates the trade himself and if something doesn't look right to him, which he thought it didn't, he checks to make sure. He checked with me and I asked why? He provided me with some info that I wasn't aware of, which, if I had of known, I wouldn't have agreed to the trade. Simple as that.
It's a Fantasy League for some fun, build a bridge and move on. The fact that a trade involving the Commisioner was passed has no relevance. The fact is, no one else in our league has agreed to a trade at all yet for anything else to have even been considered by the Commisioner.
lol mate i read your post but it still doesnt make sense to me. I think if you ask any person on here if Danny Granger for Charlie V Vs G Payton for Channing Frye and ask what one seems a more fair trade a majority of them would say the granger one!
So i find this not fair at all, you cant agree to a trade and then back out because the commisioner gives u 'info' lol
Commisioner is not spose to give tips to other gms about things.
I just find the whole thing a bit strange thats all
So i find this not fair at all, you cant agree to a trade and then back out because the commisioner gives u 'info' lol
Commisioner is not spose to give tips to other gms about things.
I just find the whole thing a bit strange thats all
^That's what it says smart guy, like I said, it's all in the post, you just haven't read it through and processed it yet. That's why you don't understand it.
This is a fantasy league, it's based on stats and what will help your team. That's what the info was based on. That's also why Payton helps my team more than Frye. If you checked the Fantasy League rankings, you would see that Payton sits alot higher than Frye
Again, the trade that went through has nothing to do with the vetoed trade, so why are people comparing it?
Regarding giving me tips, not true, he gave me up to date information. That's what a Fantasy League commisioner does when something doesn't look right to him.
Dude, I wasn't going to say anything, but it needs to be said. You're pissed because you wanted Charlie V for someone who was on your benched player list and it didn't go through. Like I said, get over it and move on. There's no mallace going on here. It's only highlighted because you don't know how fantasy leagues work and because it's one of the only trades that has happened thus far.
I only commented because you burst out saying you were hard done by and Dream is all to blame for it. This was my decision to back out, which I can do before the Commisioner approves the trade. I hope that sinks in because I don't know what else I can say?
By the way, Matty, the info was common knowledge, it's just that I wasn't aware of it. Harrington was traded to the Pacers (which I expected would eat into game time for Granger?). Bogut injured (so I expect CV will be more dominent on the Boards). That was basically the extent of it.
This is a fantasy league, it's based on stats and what will help your team. That's what the info was based on. That's also why Payton helps my team more than Frye. If you checked the Fantasy League rankings, you would see that Payton sits alot higher than Frye
Again, the trade that went through has nothing to do with the vetoed trade, so why are people comparing it?
Regarding giving me tips, not true, he gave me up to date information. That's what a Fantasy League commisioner does when something doesn't look right to him.
Dude, I wasn't going to say anything, but it needs to be said. You're pissed because you wanted Charlie V for someone who was on your benched player list and it didn't go through. Like I said, get over it and move on. There's no mallace going on here. It's only highlighted because you don't know how fantasy leagues work and because it's one of the only trades that has happened thus far.
I only commented because you burst out saying you were hard done by and Dream is all to blame for it. This was my decision to back out, which I can do before the Commisioner approves the trade. I hope that sinks in because I don't know what else I can say?
By the way, Matty, the info was common knowledge, it's just that I wasn't aware of it. Harrington was traded to the Pacers (which I expected would eat into game time for Granger?). Bogut injured (so I expect CV will be more dominent on the Boards). That was basically the extent of it.
mate i dont appreciate how u said that stuff above with saying- thats wat it says smart guy, AT ALL!
Its over now but u ask anyone on this league or any league, if u accept a trade that we originally did it should always go through, fact is you backed out after recieving 'info' that harrington was back at the pacers , thats crap mate im sorry- anyone who knows NBA knew that a long time ago.
POINT IS- You accepted a trade that we did, then pulled out, which should not be aloud. If ya didnt like it as the gm in the first place you would of declined it.
Thats all im saying.
Ask anyone mate a majority of people would see what i am saying as fair most of the time! So dont give me cheek about questioning it
Its over now but u ask anyone on this league or any league, if u accept a trade that we originally did it should always go through, fact is you backed out after recieving 'info' that harrington was back at the pacers , thats crap mate im sorry- anyone who knows NBA knew that a long time ago.
POINT IS- You accepted a trade that we did, then pulled out, which should not be aloud. If ya didnt like it as the gm in the first place you would of declined it.
Thats all im saying.
Ask anyone mate a majority of people would see what i am saying as fair most of the time! So dont give me cheek about questioning it
All im saying is dont get snappy at me mate for asking a logical question about the whole thing. You ask anyone.. You accept a trade as the GM then you cant turn back, now it has turned back thats it i spose but all im saying is that its not how things usually go.
Thats all.
Thats all.
Similar threads
