No no, my friend. That´s not what I meant. I tried to say that the guys who maybe don´t believe this story (because they are friends of him) can try to contact Steve Stabilo and ask him if just one of my words are a lie!
BEWARE => "good_old_bball" !!! HE CHEATED ME !!
- Thread starter Bolli
- Start date
- Status
MattWasGF4L
Administrator
Steve (carter) if you hit "reply with quote" it will neatly put the quoted text in a highlighted box and then you can comment underneath
Honestly, I have a feeling that a lot of people have been trying to contact him......id be surprised if he doesnt have 20 messages....
lilreddevil
KD35
Personally sent him an email myself.
ooneil
OzCardTrader
Evidence, legal precedence - WTF are you talking about mate.
Do you actually have experience what so ever in legal circles?
Do you actually have experience what so ever in legal circles?
lilreddevil
KD35
Nah it's not. There's no legally anywhere here? Where's the legally binding contract, ie. deal thread? I don't see it.
Sanctum
collecting random stuff
Unless anyone commenting about law here is or was a lawyer, I would suggest the legalities be left aside for the time being. Not pointing fingers but honestly, it's like an argument about what it feels like to lay an egg at this point.
I doubt that G would publicly post what he did in such a thread, as well as try to sell the card back as part of a scam. That would be idiotic and I don't really know G but I can't believe he would do that. I think that's the most ludicrous assumption I've read so far, if you are indeed making that assumption.
I doubt that G would publicly post what he did in such a thread, as well as try to sell the card back as part of a scam. That would be idiotic and I don't really know G but I can't believe he would do that. I think that's the most ludicrous assumption I've read so far, if you are indeed making that assumption.
Cobretti
Fleer Collector
wasnt it mentioned (unless i misread) that G already had the card as collateral before the deal was done with Bolli. Therefor the card really belongs to G and Steve sold something he never had possession of.
ooneil
OzCardTrader
No not really - the person seems to have held that card as collateral BEFORE it was sold to Bolly.
A precedence is any act, decision, or case that serves as a guide or justification for subsequent situations - your a little confused by the term.
If my house is mortgaged to the bank and i sell it to you without paying back the bank I can guarantee you that you wont come out owning my house.
MattWasGF4L
Administrator
I don't know whether to bother keep replying or not 
The problem here is what are the legal implications on ownership when dealing through the internet, paypal and forums? (with no deal in writing). It's easy with ebay because they own paypal, the company through which the claim is going and they have record of the transaction/details/description through the ebay listing and have your details registered on both ebay and paypal. Here, Bolli has sent money through paypal to GOB. Can he claim back the money for "goods not received"?
I have no experience in doing a claim for a non ebay transaction through paypal and don't even know if you can or if it has to go to a police matter, in which case it's difficult being in different countries hence Bolli asking for advice here and through a lawyer. If you can shed some light it would be useful rather than unsubstantiated or quoted info and jargon.
The problem here is what are the legal implications on ownership when dealing through the internet, paypal and forums? (with no deal in writing). It's easy with ebay because they own paypal, the company through which the claim is going and they have record of the transaction/details/description through the ebay listing and have your details registered on both ebay and paypal. Here, Bolli has sent money through paypal to GOB. Can he claim back the money for "goods not received"?
I have no experience in doing a claim for a non ebay transaction through paypal and don't even know if you can or if it has to go to a police matter, in which case it's difficult being in different countries hence Bolli asking for advice here and through a lawyer. If you can shed some light it would be useful rather than unsubstantiated or quoted info and jargon.
kiwi_in_melb
OZCT Supporter
20 pages wooooooooot!!!
lilreddevil
KD35
That's not a contract though. A conversation isn't a contract.
MasterBlaster
OzCardTrader
Yes and no Carter, it depends on WHEN "G" got the card, if Steve gave the card to "G" before the sale, then "G" would still need to account for the card with some kind of signed statement as it was in Lieu for payment until such payment was made. If he cant, then he is as guilty as all of them in how this all has transpired.
Nothing personal to Mr.G, however him holding this card is complicating it just a bit.
Nothing personal to Mr.G, however him holding this card is complicating it just a bit.
Mully
Hall Of Fame
I dont know you or the user in question, so i am not casting aspersions either way. My whole point was that site owners and/or users can get in all sorts of **** for defaming someone. Even if you think your side of the story is the truth, there are proper chanels for this.
Do yourself a favour and go to the police. Do it right, dont just have a whinge on a discussion forum.
MattWasGF4L
Administrator
Who wants a skippy badge for using big words?
- Status
Similar threads
