B BlueBoy23 OzCardTrader Messages 297 Location Melbourne Real Name Matt eBay User kreuuzz Jun 24, 2023 #21 FRITS said: As stated, the number is correct. It's only a double digit print run so it would only warrent a double digit number Click to expand... Technically that should be correct, but also not what they did for that card - the rest had a 0 in front
FRITS said: As stated, the number is correct. It's only a double digit print run so it would only warrent a double digit number Click to expand... Technically that should be correct, but also not what they did for that card - the rest had a 0 in front
N Nightwatchman OzCardTrader Messages 221 Location Blackburn, Victoria Real Name Glenn eBay User cardscart Jun 25, 2023 #22 BLOWN8 said: But shouldn’t it be 13/30 and not 013/30 anyway? Click to expand... You'd think so, but as @BlueBoy23 says, all the 2012 FF golds had a zero in front of their numbers. The Pongracic that I sent back was 013 and came back 13.
BLOWN8 said: But shouldn’t it be 13/30 and not 013/30 anyway? Click to expand... You'd think so, but as @BlueBoy23 says, all the 2012 FF golds had a zero in front of their numbers. The Pongracic that I sent back was 013 and came back 13.
meeda13 OzCardTrader Messages 207 Location melbourne Real Name Lucas eBay User meeda13 Jun 27, 2023 #23 FRITS said: As stated, the number is correct. It's only a double digit print run so it would only warrent a double digit number Click to expand... I think pre 2016 even if it was a double digit print run they still put the zero in front regardless. There were cases where they didn’t as well. Mostly in Future force as noted above. Pretty strange
FRITS said: As stated, the number is correct. It's only a double digit print run so it would only warrent a double digit number Click to expand... I think pre 2016 even if it was a double digit print run they still put the zero in front regardless. There were cases where they didn’t as well. Mostly in Future force as noted above. Pretty strange