You just want your team to put up a good fight no matter the result. It's hard though when so many key players don't turn up in the same game.I am off to Canberra v NZ this week at Redcliffe.
I expect NZ to bounce back hard and Canberra have been awful so it might be a long afternoon !!
Yeah they are busted poor old NZ but I am sure they still have fight, Curran is the biggest loss.I dunno Cam, they have put up a fight all season, and had a BAD 30 minutes. Curran has been our energiser bunny, he got injured, DWZ knocked out cold, SJ obviously lame (he did not kick all night, they sent it back to Walsh), a rookie that single-handedly cost 20 points and CHT played the last 45 minutes with a ruptured testicle.
Brendan, usually I'd be semi-confident this week, but we have no fit halfs - Ash Taylor with his dodgy hip has likely played his 1 and only game, Kodi Nikorima has Covid, SJ is clearly injured and Harris-Tavita (who has been awesome) is out for a few weeks. They have drafted in Asi from the Cows. I think your Raiders will be alright.
I am off to Canberra v NZ this week at Redcliffe.
Holy Moly that Lodge lay down Sally move in the last couple of minutes for a penalty was a disgrace.I am off to Canberra v NZ this week at Redcliffe.
I expect NZ to bounce back hard and Canberra have been awful so it might be a long afternoon !!
I guess that is footy though hey. Sometimes you get these calls in your favour, sometimes not.Yeah I agree . I’ve seen plenty of late that were only penalised because a player stayed down and faked injury , many of which are soft at best .If they policed it hard and made it mandatory that any player that layed down and attracted a bunker call has to go off for 10 minutes. Would probably clean it up a bit ?
I guess that is footy though hey. Sometimes you get these calls in your favour, sometimes not.
The reality is though that Canberra only have themselves to blame. I said to my die hard Kiwi mate I was at the game with that the Warriors would have scored that set anyway, Canberra seemed to stripped for numbers on both sides of the ruck.
There are two other calls in the game which I think were worse than the Lodge penalty but again, can't say they cost Canberra the game.
1 - Warriors turn the ball over on halfway in the first 5 minutes, Valemi scoops it up, busts a few tackles and was away, would have scored except as soon as the ball hit the deck, the referee had blown a stoppage for a Canberra error. Canberra reviewed, it went upstairs and was ruled in their favour, a Warriors knock on. Since when have they stopped playing an advantage until the play is truly dead? You could argue that the Warriors heard the whistle and let Valemi through but they seemed to have a fair crack at tackling him from where I was seated.
2. Murdoch-Masila gets tackled, swings a pretty decent elbow / forearm at Tapine which connects and then Tapine shoves him in the face. Penalty to NZ (and I think Aitken scores off that set) when it should have been a play the ball as two big forwards were resenting each other.
Should of explained what I meant by fake better but had to get back to work haha. If a player stays down until time off is called and than makes a instant recovery, that’s fake . As you mentioned , a referee isn’t trained to access injury , only a doctor can do that so the player should be made to leave the field for 10 and go through the HIA process .If it’s bad enough for them to lay on the ground they need to be assessed by a trained professional. No one believes they can be laying there like they’ve been shot and than a whistle blows and all better like a under 6s match with the magic water . I think a bit of common sense needs to prevail as it’s getting out of hand .Fair enough on points 1 & 2. For 2, I found it interesting that everybody seemed to miss that it was Papali'i's hand that raked at BMM's eye (accidentally). Tapine just got blamed. As you said, once cleared it should have been play on, but once things go up to the bunker they rarely get that outcome, which is ridiculous.
The standard of officiating is so poor and so inconsistent, and though there were a couple of grey decisions that occurred at some very key times for the Raiders, I think both teams got it bad.
As for Lodge staying down...meh. You get hit high, then that is illegal. Be more accurate. Harsh, but true of the modern game. How can a referee rule on whether a player fakes it or not as some innocuous tackle end up in concussion injuries? A mandatory 10 minute stand down for the guy is probably a good rule though. I was actually pissed that Lodge stayed down because I thought the Warriors were odds on to score that set to seal the game rather than send it to golden point. The Raiders looked down and out.
The Warriors lost their challenge at the start of the game when AFBs play of the ball in attacking territory got caught on the retreating foot of the Raider in an accident. Neither team should have been penalised for that, especially as AFB did not lose control of the ball at any stage. The Warriors conceded points on the back of it from memory, lost an attacking set and lost their challenge (and another 10 metres for reacting to the call).
Wighton could easily have been sin-binned for his illegal tackle, which now sees him miss games. (Personally I think they got it right).
There were a number of high shots that were not called (more inconsistency)
I thought Starling's forward pass was marginal live, but I haven't watched it back.
It is all swings and roundabouts though. Over a season teams end up where they belong usually. And to be fair nether team deserved that victory.
I will say that the lack of respect that the Warriors get in Aussie media is pretty rough. Even during our long winning streak a couple of years ago the narrative is always about the other team. Add to that the agitation to get Walsh and Munster to break their contracts, which is driven by a media that has a stake in the game, and the excessive penalty that was dished out to Montoya for his naughty word. The media needs a rocket from the NRL, they have way too much influence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?