sgt_pepper
Amatuer Footballer
haha thats what i thought but there are a lot of rondo lovers out there who have made ridiculous statements before... right now i would still take nash... that will prob change in 2 yrs for sure but not because rondos skills but because of nashs age factor...
yeah, sorry, im a big rondo fan, but i never meant to imply that hes a better PG than nash.
the original question posed a 10 year contract, so looking a decade into the future (and assuming no trades) i would grab rondo...
which is also why i thought this was a tough choice, because nash is obviously a better player, but rondo will last the 10 years.
if we're comparing the two career wise, well its not even a question is it?